<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iTamers Simple SEO &#187; Search Engine Optimisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itamer.com/category/technical-discussions/search-engine-optimisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itamer.com</link>
	<description>Sarah King&#039;s blog and programming examples</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vital advice about Paid Links</title>
		<link>http://www.itamer.com/vital-advice-about-paid-links/312/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itamer.com/vital-advice-about-paid-links/312/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page-rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itamer.com/vital-advice-about-paid-links/312/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m taking an unusual step here and using someone elses article &#8211; but that&#8217;s because CReed has addressed the very issue I&#8217;ve been asked about lately &#8211; Paid Links.
I&#8217;ve sold a few links on various sites, but I haven&#8217;t solicited them and I doubt there&#8217;s been more than 5. It&#8217;s not the business I&#8217;m in. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itamer.com/vital-advice-about-paid-links/312/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directory Contest twists it up</title>
		<link>http://www.itamer.com/directory-contest-twists-it-up/311/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itamer.com/directory-contest-twists-it-up/311/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 20:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun and SEO Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike-dammann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realstate.ws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itamer.com/directory-contest-twists-it-up/311/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Dammann has launched his own Directory Contest. It&#8217;s a twist on the regular SEO contests and it&#8217;ll be interesting to see how it pans out.
I&#8217;ve got two entries

RealState for Real Estate has a Directory Contest page
Property Investment Directory has a Directory Contest page

In both cases the links aren&#8217;t visible on the directory homepage and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itamer.com/directory-contest-twists-it-up/311/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing Google Alerts</title>
		<link>http://www.itamer.com/google-alerts/297/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itamer.com/google-alerts/297/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlebot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itamer.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of days before the launch of WDANZ I thought I&#8217;d use the opportunity to analyse how effective Google Alerts are. I wanted to test the breadth of indexing and how quickly the reactions of bloggers might be picked up.
In the table below you can see how Google indexed the sites talking about this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itamer.com/google-alerts/297/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networking, Traffic and Ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.itamer.com/digg/296/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itamer.com/digg/296/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 13:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itamer.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps those three were never meant to go together!

Social Networking sites, and Digg.com in particular, aim to give users the chance to read the latest news, to vote on it and to share anything they&#8217;ve found.
They rely on group participation to provide content and to provide a reason to keep returning.
There&#8217;s a story entitled How [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itamer.com/digg/296/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSN Ad Tool points a girl in the right direction&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.itamer.com/demographics/293/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itamer.com/demographics/293/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 05:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun and SEO Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itamer.com/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, if I could just get this on an API it would be great.
I ran the MSN Ad Demographics tool past some of my favourite sites and learnt 
We&#8217;ll start with this site as an example.

Women search for Mambo (40%) but not Joomla (31%) even though they&#8217;re basically the same thing. 41% of searches for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itamer.com/demographics/293/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
