Comments on: My daughter is not for your consumption! http://www.itamer.com/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/ Sarah King's blog and programming examples Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:06:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Simple SEO » Media versus Bloggers http://www.itamer.com/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/comment-page-1/#comment-2661 Simple SEO » Media versus Bloggers Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:58:12 +0000 http://sarahk.pcpropertymanager.com/blog/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/#comment-2661 [...] I was driving home from last night listening to a radio journo on NewstalkZB reporting on the Graham Capill case. He was doing an opinion piece and mentioned that he’d gone “into cyberspace” and that people were commenting on the case. [...] [...] I was driving home from last night listening to a radio journo on NewstalkZB reporting on the Graham Capill case. He was doing an opinion piece and mentioned that he’d gone “into cyberspace” and that people were commenting on the case. [...]

]]> By: Simple SEO » Google and the Caps lock http://www.itamer.com/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/comment-page-1/#comment-2659 Simple SEO » Google and the Caps lock Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:57:27 +0000 http://sarahk.pcpropertymanager.com/blog/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/#comment-2659 [...] upper case search - currently my Graham Capill post is #2 [...] [...] upper case search – currently my Graham Capill post is #2 [...]

]]> By: Simple SEO » Bloggers warned about law in Capill case http://www.itamer.com/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/comment-page-1/#comment-2655 Simple SEO » Bloggers warned about law in Capill case Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:48:55 +0000 http://sarahk.pcpropertymanager.com/blog/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/#comment-2655 [...] I’ve written here about the Graham Capill case, the double standards and the media reaction to bloggers. But wait! there’s more: Bloggers warned about law in Capill case. [...] [...] I’ve written here about the Graham Capill case, the double standards and the media reaction to bloggers. But wait! there’s more: Bloggers warned about law in Capill case. [...]

]]> By: sarahk http://www.itamer.com/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/comment-page-1/#comment-797 sarahk Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:14:26 +0000 http://sarahk.pcpropertymanager.com/blog/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/#comment-797 A quick update on Capill from the <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/search/story.cfm?storyid=0001FA6C-64C8-134C-A7D083027AF1010F">NZ Herald</a> <blockquote> Convicted paedophile and former Christian Heritage Party leader Graham Capill faces being struck off as a lawyer after a complaint to the Law Society. Capill, 46, a former police prosecutor, is serving a jail term in for sex offences against three girls aged between five and 11 over a period coinciding with his time as Christian Heritage leader. </blockquote> What - he only "faces" being struck off? Surely this is a no brainer? Yet Capill's supporters can still send out emails like this: <blockquote>Graham's offences [snip] which stopped more than three years ago. The offences were not rape as understood from what I understand the Bible to mean, which is why Graham had such a concern about how to plea (as mentioned in the email that was leaked to the media).[<a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/archives/012060.html" title="Read the full story at David Farrar's Blog">more</a>]</blockquote> A quick update on Capill from the NZ Herald

Convicted paedophile and former Christian Heritage Party leader Graham Capill faces being struck off as a lawyer after a complaint to the Law Society.

Capill, 46, a former police prosecutor, is serving a jail term in for sex offences against three girls aged between five and 11 over a period coinciding with his time as Christian Heritage leader.

What – he only “faces” being struck off? Surely this is a no brainer? Yet Capill’s supporters can still send out emails like this:

Graham’s offences [snip] which stopped more than three years ago. The offences were not rape as understood from what I understand the Bible to mean, which is why Graham had such a concern about how to plea (as mentioned in the email that was leaked to the media).[more]

]]> By: Tony Beard http://www.itamer.com/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/comment-page-1/#comment-284 Tony Beard Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:30:43 +0000 http://sarahk.pcpropertymanager.com/blog/my-daughter-is-not-for-your-consumption/25/#comment-284 I went to school with Graham Capill and his dad was the deputy head- the school - well known in Chch for being rather extreme in some of its religous views and also at the time I went for its liberal use of corporal punishment, soem teachers who will remain anonymous seemed to revell in this form of pumishment. It was not till in the late stages of the 6th form and early in the 7th form that I really began to realise how screwed up not only some of my fellow pupils were, but also some of the teachers- I would definitely add Graham's father to that list. There is no defense for what Graham has done, but to be perfectly honest it comes as not great surprise to me (there were no indications at school, or if there were I was oblivious to them) but given the mix of the religous background, his fathers disturbing attitude to matters of sex (I will not go into here some of the bizarre discussion he led in 7th form classes) and his personality at school, there was always a fair chance somethign would go 'wrong' in Grahams life. Understand this he is an arrogant individual who is well versed at justifying n his own mind the gravity of his actions- I wonder at what control he hasover both his wife and children for them to stand by him, I know what the reaction of my wife would be (and any other 'normal' person) to this type of crime. The answer to Graham's actions lie in his past , abusers are more often than not have been abused themselves..... I went to school with Graham Capill and his dad was the deputy head- the school – well known in Chch for being rather extreme in some of its religous views and also at the time I went for its liberal use of corporal punishment, soem teachers who will remain anonymous seemed to revell in this form of pumishment.

It was not till in the late stages of the 6th form and early in the 7th form that I really began to realise how screwed up not only some of my fellow pupils were, but also some of the teachers- I would definitely add Graham’s father to that list.

There is no defense for what Graham has done, but to be perfectly honest it comes as not great surprise to me (there were no indications at school, or if there were I was oblivious to them) but given the mix of the religous background, his fathers disturbing attitude to matters of sex (I will not go into here some of the bizarre discussion he led in 7th form classes) and his personality at school, there was always a fair chance somethign would go ‘wrong’ in Grahams life.

Understand this he is an arrogant individual who is well versed at justifying n his own mind the gravity of his actions- I wonder at what control he hasover both his wife and children for them to stand by him, I know what the reaction of my wife would be (and any other ‘normal’ person) to this type of crime.

The answer to Graham’s actions lie in his past , abusers are more often than not have been abused themselves…..

]]>