<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iTamers Simple SEO &#187; whois</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itamer.com/tag/whois/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itamer.com</link>
	<description>Sarah King&#039;s blog and programming examples</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Domain registration changes we need!</title>
		<link>http://www.itamer.com/domain-registration-changes-we-need/336/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itamer.com/domain-registration-changes-we-need/336/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical Discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain-registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whois]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itamer.com/domain-registration-changes-we-need/336/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I check the whois records for domains reasonably often. Whoisguard type systems are commonly in place to protect the identity of the domain owner. No problems there. What irks, though, is the people who give completely false information&#8230; like this one where the info is incomplete and gives an Australian address yet I know that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itamer.com/domain-registration-changes-we-need/336/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DMOZ is Corrupt? I don&#8217;t think so</title>
		<link>http://www.itamer.com/dmoz-corrupt/140/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itamer.com/dmoz-corrupt/140/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult-sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jayde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joeant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skaffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whois]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahk.pcpropertymanager.com/blog/dmoz-corruption-and-gworld/140/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The major forums seem to have nasty little threads popping up left, right and centre about corruption at DMOZ. It&#8217;s hard to believe there&#8217;s anything other than the occasional individual having a go, but some are claiming orchestrated campaigns. It&#8217;s fairly well known that I&#8217;m a DMOZ editor yet I&#8217;ve never been approached by any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itamer.com/dmoz-corrupt/140/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

